Murray cod management model

Murray cod management model
Big cod Murrumbidgee Photo credit: Jamin Forbes

Big cod Murrumbidgee Photo credit: Jamin Forbes

Fish population models are built using information about a species’ biology and lifecycle to try and simulate the population, and relationships with external factors that may affect the population.  The main use of these models is to hypothetically assess the impacts (negative or positive) of different management or environmental scenarios. Their predictive power gives fisheries managers a mathematical ‘crystal bowl’ to enable them to manage their fisheries in an informed way. Prior to this project, no such model has been created for Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii).

The objectives of this project were to:

  • Develop a computer model (or models) to represent the population dynamics of Murray cod under alternative management options.
  • Develop various management scenarios in relation to size, bag limits and potential recovery times from over fishing, fish kills and other management or environmental scenarios which may affect Murray cod populations.
  • Document the findings of this work, and outline the implications for developing management options for Murray cod.
  • Identify knowledge gaps concerning Murray cod biology and ecology that need investigating for improved management models to be developed.

Findings

Murray cod caught in the Bidgee. Photo credit: Jamin Forbes

Murray cod caught in the Bidgee. Photo credit: Jamin Forbes

Modelled management scenarios for Murray cod indicate that risk to populations can be reduced substantially by appropriate changes to management actions. In particular, changes to recreational fisher size limits can have a major impact on long term survival of populations. The implementation of a slot size that protects both smaller and larger fish reduced population risk considerably.

Whilst habitat changes are difficult to quantify, it was shown that reductions in amount of habitat can place additional risk on populations, particularly when combined with angler take. Importantly, the collective impacts of less recognised threats such as thermal pollution, fish kills, mortalities to larvae over weirs, and losses into irrigation off-takes need to be as these threats are likely to be contributing significantly to mortalities at certain sites.

Risk curve comparison for different scenarios. Photo credit: Charles Todd

Risk curve comparison for different scenarios. Photo credit: Charles Todd

Graphical outputs from a fishing scenario. Photo credit: Charles Todd

Graphical outputs from a fishing scenario. Photo credit: Charles Todd

 

Implications for native fish

The methods outlined in this study offer a formalised, rational, modelling approach which can form the basis for the assessment and prioritisation of management options for Murray cod.  Such modelling highlights data gaps and monitoring requirements, and can become an integral part of the conservation and fishery management process.  The model provides a tool for exploring the outcomes of management scenarios at both the regional and local scale. The modelling process has also helped facilitate inter-agency Murray cod management and the coordination of approaches between fishery managers, water and environmental protection/conservation agencies.

References

Todd, C.R. and Koehn, J.D. (2009), Murray cod modelling to address key management actions: final report for project MD745. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.

Todd, C.R. and Koehn, J.D. (2009). Murray Cod Management Model: User manual.  Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Report to the Murray Darling Basin Commission. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Report, Department of Sustainability and Environment.

Koehn, J.D. ((2009). Multiscale habitat selection by Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii) in two lowland rivers. Journal of Fish Biology.75,13-129.

Koehn, J.D. (2010). Conservation and utilisation:harnessing forces for better outcomes for native fishes. Ecological Management and Restoration. 11,86-87.

Koehn, J.D. (2011). Spatial management for freshwater fish: a case study for Murray cod. In: Treloar, M.A. and Tilzey, R.D. Spatial Management in Fisheries:Proceedings of the Australian Society for Fish Biology Workshop, Canberra. Australian Society for Fish Biology, Canberra.

Cadwallader, P.L. and Gooley, G.J. 1985. Propagation and rearing of Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii) at the Warmwater Fisheries Station Pilot Project Lake Charlegrark. Government Printer, Melbourne.

Kearney, R.E. and Kildea M.A.  2001. The Status of Murray Cod in the Murray-Darling Basin.  Applied Ecology Research Group, University of Canberra, Canberra.

Megrey, B.A. 1989. Review and comparison of age-structured stock assessment models from theoretical and applied points of view. Pp. 8–48. In: Edwards, E.F., Megrey, B.A. (Eds.), Mathematical Analysis of Fish Stock Dynamics. American Fisheries Society Symposium 6.

Todd, C.R. and Koehn, J.D.  2009a.  Murray Cod Management Model: User Manual.  Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research. (Department of Sustainability and Environment: Heidelberg).

Todd, C.R. and Koehn, J.D. 2009b. Murray cod modelling to address key management actions: final report for project MD745. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Report to the Murray Darling Basin Commission. Department of Sustainability and Environment: Heidelberg.

Todd, C.R. and Lovelace P.R. 2009. Essential, version 2.12.  http://livinglogic.com.au/Essential.html 2 Oct 2009.

The following two tabs change content below.
Finterest

Finterest

Finterest provides you with access to the latest research, science and stories about native and introduced fish in Australia.
Leave a comment: