The decline in connectivity of lowland rivers to their floodplain habitats (amongst a range of other factors) has contributed substantially to the decline of their native fish populations. Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii) are a fish species that are known to use both mainstem and anabranch habitats in the Murray-Darling Basin, but the importance of these habitats to this species remain unresolved. The objectives of this project were:
- Compare anabranch and mainstem Murray cod populations
- Determine the degree of movement of Murray cod between mainstem/anabranch populations
- Provide a fishway operation guide to river managers of the Broken Creek
Populations of main channel and anabranch Murray cod were compared by capturing Murray cod by boat electrofishing. The movements of Murray cod was assessed using radio-telemetry and mark re-capture methods.
Numbers of Murray cod were found to be higher in the Mullaroo Creek anabranch compared to the main Murray River channel. The Mullaroo Creek anabranch population comprised a higher proportion of larger individuals compared to the Murray River main channel population. Mature sized Murray cod that inhabited the main river channel generally moved into this anabranch prior to, and during the spawning period. In general, larger Murray cod were found to make upstream migrations prior to and during the spawning season, though some of these movements occurred several months before the spawning season. Most migrating individuals returned to their home site after the spawning season was over. Juvenile Murray cod (< 500 mm) were found to only make small localised movements during both spawning and non-spawning times.
Implications for native fish
Anabranches are an important year-round habitat and a likely important spawning habitat for Murray cod. Passage to and from these off-channel habitats is important for Murray cod populations.
This study suggests that Murray cod at the legal size for taking (500 mm) are unlikely to have spawned. This has important implications for populations of Murray cod in heavily fished areas. Since this study, the legal size of Murray cod has been increased to 600 mm.
Saddlier, S., O’Mahony, J. & Ramsey, D. (2008). Protection and enhancement of Murray cod populations. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Technical Report Series No. 172. Heidelberg, Victoria: Department of Sustainability and Environment.
Koehn, J.D. (2009a). Multiscale habitat selection by Murray cod Maccullochella peelii peeli in two lowland rivers. Journal of Fish Biology, 75, 113-129.
Koehn, J.D. (2009b). Using radio telemetry to evaluate the depths inhabited by Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii). Marine and Freshwater Research, 60, 317-320.
Koehn, J.D. (2011). Spatial management of freshwater fish: a case study for Murray cod. In: Treloar, M.A. and Tilzey, R.D. (eds.) Spatial Management in Fisheries. Proceedings of the Australian Society for Fish Biology Workshop. Australian Society for Fish Biology, Canberra.
Koehn, J.D., McKenzie, J.A., O’ Mahony, D.J. and Nichol, S.J. (2009). Movements of Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peelii) in a large Australian lowland river. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 18, 594-602.
Todd, C.R. (2009). Murray cod management model: an application of essential modelling software. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne.
Latest posts by Finterest (see all)
- Population models help assess risk for a threatened species - December 3, 2018
- Zeb Hogan presents Monsterfish Free Public Lecture - November 22, 2018
- Climate change, stream flows and recruitment – is there a connection for Australian Bass? - November 19, 2018