Fishes require water and a wide diversity of submerged structures to provide them with the right conditions to maintain sustainable populations. The term habitat refers generally to an area (or areas) within which the requirements of all life history stages of a species are met*. This may occur over a limited area, or it may be made up of a variety of different habitats over a broad landscape. An area where recruitment occurs on a scale sufficient to sustain a population may be different to the adult habitat where feeding and growth occurs. For example, Golden perch may use inundated floodplains as nursery habitats, but return to the river system for the remainder of their life cycle. Where species like Golden perch may migrate many kilometres between habitats, others, like the Barred galaxies an inhabitant of small mountain streams, have a more restricted, specialised habitat.
A number of fish habitat projects were invested in through the NFS.
Habitat includes both abiotic (non-living) and biotic (living) components. The aboitic components encompass such aspects as the water body geomorphology, the flow characteristic and bed substrate (for example, gravel or sand) type, together with the water chemistry. In most instances, these characteristics are highly dynamic in Australian inland waters and they directly influence fish and other living things.
Source: Koehn, J.D. and Kennard, M.J. (2013). Habitats, In, Ecology of Australian Freshwater Fishes., Humphries, P. and Walker, K (eds), pp 81-104, CSIRO Publishing, Victoria, Australia
Above all we need to remember: No Habitat No Fish
Broad Habitat Types
There are two broad habitat types within freshwater environments, lotic habitats (flowing waters) and lentic habitats (non-flowing waters).
Lotic habitats, rivers and streams, are formed by the interactions between the landscape, geology, climate and vegetation where they are located. The intensity, frequency and duration of rainfall and the gradient combine to impose energy on the river channel. This creates structures important to fish such as pool/riffle sequences, substrate diversity, undercut banks etc.
Rivers and streams interact in three dimensions. Longitudinally, there is a general change along the channel from fast flowing upland slopes to low land, slow flowing and often meandering watercourses. Maintaining longitudinal connectivity is important for fish to be able to access different habitats at different stages of their life cycles. Laterally, watercourses connect with their floodplain often connecting with lentic habitats such as floodplain wetlands. Maintaining connectivity with the floodplain is important in maintaining the lifecycles of many fishes. Finally, there are vertical connections with the underlying bed substrate and groundwater. Changes to groundwater levels will impact on river hydrology and potentially water quality (e.g. saline intrusion).
Lentic habitats are characterised by a general lack of flow, particularly in isolated lakes. However, the most common natural lentic habitats in the Murray-Darling basin are associated with floodplains. These floodplains may take on many of the characteristics of lotic habitats during over bank flood events. Persistent floodplain wetlands form important refugia for fish when the rest of the floodplain dries up. The occurrence of lentic habitats has increased significantly since European settlement due to the construction of dams and weirs. Much of the Lower Murray resembles a lentic habitat for significant periods due to the number of locks along its length and resulting lack of flow diversity.
Within the broad habitat types of lentic and lotic, there is a wide diversity of conditions including flow variations, substrate types, instream structures (such as log jams), depth, shading (influencing temperature etc.) and water chemistry. This results in a wide range of habitats which fish exploit at various stages in their life cycles. Koehn and Kennard (2013) make the distinction between mesohabitats (e.g. riffles and pools) and microhabitats (e.g.areas of different depth, substrate, cover etc. within a pool or riffle).
This habitat diversity is vital to inland fishes, it varies both spatially and temporally. Fish move between these habitats to access resources depending on their habitat preferences at different stages of their life cycles. Whilst some information is available on the mesohabitat preferences of many freshwater fishes (e.g adult Murray cod are most often associated with deep pools with instream cover; Southern pygmy perch, prefer slow or still waters associated with aquatic vegetation), much less is known about microhabitat preferences.
Healthy Fish Populations need Good Habitat
Since European settlement there has been significant habitat degradation throughout the Murray-Darling Basin. This has led to a decline in the numbers and distribution of native fishes. Impacts include; regulation or modification of in stream flows, physical alteration of habitats (infrastructure, river engineering), desnagging, removal of riparian vegetation, erosion and siltation caused by poor land management, changes in water quality (e.g. increased salinity), barriers to fish movement reducing access to critical habitat, introduction of alien species (e.g. Carp ) etc.
The Native Fish Strategy (NFS), released in 2003, provided a long-term strategic approach to addressing the multiple causes of degraded condition of river systems throughout the Murray-Darling Basin with the aim of rehabilitating habitats and fish populations over a 50 year period. Over the last 10 years, actions under the NFS have greatly increased or knowledge of the habitat requirements of native fishes, and on-ground actions have begun to protect and rehabilitate key habitats across the Basin. For example, the demonstration reach program has promoted habitat rehabilitation through involving local communities in the rehabilitation of river reaches and demonstrating the benefits for native fish populations and river health in general.
It is important that the momentum gained through the NFS is not lost. Future rehabilitation activities should build on the experiences of the NFS and focus on protecting and rehabilitating critical fish habitats (e.g. drought refugia), maintaining connectivity between habitats and maintaining habitat diversity and quality across the Basin. Actions should continue to be underpinned with good science and an adaptive management approach.
Koehn, J.D. and Kennard, M.J. (2013). Habitats, In, Ecology of Australian Freshwater Fishes., Humphries, P. and Walker, K (eds), pp 81-104, CSIRO Publishing, Victoria, Australia.
Latest posts by Finterest (see all)
- Making a difference at Katarapko and Katfish Reach - May 31, 2019
- Population models help assess risk for a threatened species - December 3, 2018
- Zeb Hogan presents Monsterfish Free Public Lecture - November 22, 2018